| |
CDJ 2026 MHC 775
|
| Case No : W.P. No. 3207 of 2026 & W.M.P. Nos. 3635 & 3637 of 2026 |
| Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN |
| Parties : Redinmas Stores, Proprietor Maniyam, Nagapattinam Versus The State Tax Officer, Nagapattinam Assessment circle, Thiruvarur |
| Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: M/s. B. Mitra, Advocate. For the Respondent: C. Harsharaj, Special Government Pleader. |
| Date of Judgment : 05-02-2026 |
| Head Note :- |
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
|
| Summary :- |
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- Constitution of India, Article 226
- Section 107 of the GST enactments, 2017
2. Catch Words:
- limitation
- writ of certiorari
- personal hearing
- pre‑deposit
- remand
- bank attachment
3. Summary:
The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari under Article 226 to quash a GST adjudication order dated 26‑02‑2025, alleging it was arbitrary and illegal. The petitioner had ignored multiple show‑cause notices and personal hearing opportunities, and the limitation period for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act had expired. The court, noting the petitioner’s willingness to pre‑deposit 25 % of the disputed tax, remitted the matter to the revenue authority to pass a fresh order, subject to that deposit and filing of a reply within 30 days. The bank attachment was ordered to be lifted upon compliance. Failure to comply would allow the respondent to recover tax as if the petition were dismissed. The petition was disposed with no costs.
4. Conclusion:
Petition Dismissed |
| Judgment :- |
|
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 26.02.2025 in Form GST DRC-07 vide Reference No. ZD330225270174P, GSTIN: 33ABNPM1940M1ZF, pertaining to FY 2020-21 issued by the respondent as arbitrary and illegal and quash the same, and further directing the respondent to redo the adjudication in accordance with law, after granting opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.)
1. Mr.C. Harsharaj, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the Respondent.
2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondent.
3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 26.02.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 24.11.2024 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 26.02.2025.
4. The Petitioner was also issued with Reminder on 09.01.2025, 30.01.2025 and 11.02.2025 which called upon the Petitioner to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. However, the Petitioner neither filed any reply nor appeared for the personal hearing despite multiple opportunities. Thus, the impugned Order has been passed.
5. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 29.01.2026.
6. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 25% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication.
7. Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 25% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.
8. Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
9. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 24.11.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 26.02.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 24.11.2024.
10. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.
11. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.
12. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
13. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.
14. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
|
| |