| |
CDJ 2025 MHC 7101
|
| Court : High Court of Judicature at Madras |
| Case No : W.P. No. 46274 of 2025 & W.M.P. Nos. 51621 & 51623 of 2025 |
| Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN |
| Parties : Tvl.Kafeel Tanners, Represented by its Proprietor, Mohammed Rasiq Noufal Versus The Deputy State Tax Officer - II, Periya Agraharam Circle, Erode |
| Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: Samuel Rupesh Rajkumar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Advocate. |
| Date of Judgment : 27-11-2025 |
| Head Note :- |
| Constitution of India - Article 226 - |
| Summary :- |
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- Article 226 of the Constitution of India
- Section 73 of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017
- Section 107 of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017
2. Catch Words:
- Writ of Certiorari
- Limitation
- Natural justice
- Appeal
- Remittance
- Bank attachment
- Deposit of disputed tax
3. Summary:
The petition under Article 226 sought a writ of certiorari to quash an order dated 24‑06‑2024 passed under Section 73 of the CGST/TNGST Act. The petitioner had ignored show‑cause notices and personal hearing notices, leading to the order. The court noted that the limitation period for filing an appeal under Section 107 had expired. While similar cases had been quashed, the court chose to remit the matter, directing the petitioner to deposit 50 % of the disputed tax and file a reply within 30 days. Upon compliance, the respondent must pass a fresh order and lift the bank attachment; otherwise, recovery proceedings will continue. The petition is disposed with these observations and no costs.
4. Conclusion:
Petition Dismissed |
| Judgment :- |
|
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the Respondent in GSTIN:33ASIPM9114D1ZY/2019-20, culminating in the Order dated 24.06.2024 passed under Section 73 of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 and summary of the order in Form DRC – 07 bearing Reference No.ZD330624258155F and to quash all the impugned proceedings as passed contrary to the provisions of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 and against the principles of natural justice.)
1. Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.
2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.
3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 24.06.2024, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 02.03.2024 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 24.06.2024.
4. The Petitioner was also issued with Reminders on 03.05.2024 and 08.06.2024, which called upon the Petitioner to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. The Petitioner however neither filed any reply nor appeared for the personal hearing fixed on 09.05.2024 and on 14.06.2024. Thus, the impugned Orders have been passed.
5. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 14.11.2025.
6. Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 25% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.
7. Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
8. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 02.03.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 24.06.2024 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 02.03.2024.
9. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.
10. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the deposit of 50% of the disputed tax as ordered above and no other amount is in arrears barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.
11. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
12. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.
13. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
|
| |