logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 MHC 319 print Preview print Next print
Court : High Court of Judicature at Madras
Case No : W.P. No. 476 of 2026 & W.M.P. Nos. 586 & 588 of 2026
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Parties : C. Easwaramoorthy Versus The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests Chief Conservator of forest Office, Chennai & Others
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: Niranjan Rajagopalan for M. Marudhachalam, Advocates. For the Respondents: Dr. T. Seenivasan, Special Government Pleader.
Date of Judgment : 09-01-2026
Head Note :-
Constitution of India - Article 226 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 MHC 157,
Summary :-
Mistral API responded but no summary was generated.
Judgment :-

(Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent dated 28.11.2025 passed in RC. No.13256/2024/V2 and quash the same, consequently directing the 3rd respondent to modify the order in so far as the timings fixed as condition No.10 therein and to permit the devotees to stay on the 7th Hill top during nights to perform the Nanda Deepa Pooja.)

1. I heard Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan, learned counsel appearing for Mr.M.Marudhachalam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr.T.Seenivasan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner claims to be a devotee of the Arulmigu Vellingiri Swayambhu Eeswaran. During the Tamil month of ‘Thai’, devotees of the said deity climb the hills to perform religious rituals at the Eeswaran Temple. It is not in dispute that the temple is situated in Bolampatti Block-II reserved forest area. This area had been declared as reserved forest at least a century and half ago.

3. The petitioner approached the 3rd respondent seeking permission to perform religious rites in the aforesaid temple. The 3rd respondent considered the request and passed an order, permitting the devotees to have access to the temple from 7 in the morning till 4 in the evening. The petitioner challenges this restrictive clause relating to timings alone.

4. Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan states that there are totally six temples before reaching Vellingiri Swayambhu Eeswaran Temple. The entire distance is about 5.4 Km, and it would take not less than seven hours to reach the temple and an equal amount of time to descend. Hence, he requestes that this Court set aside the restrictive timing clause.

5. Taking into consideration the plea of the petitioner, I called upon Dr.T.Seenivasan to get instructions from the District Forest Officer (DFO). He has produced the instructions, which have been scanned and extracted hereunder:

                   

                   

                    

                   

                   

6. A perusal of the same would show that the District Forest Officer fears man-animal conflict after the sunset. In addition, he apprehends that if a large number of pilgrims were to enter the forest and are careless with lighting lamps or other materials, etc, it might lead to forest fires. Dr.T.Seenivasan states that once the sun sets, it becomes difficult for the devotees themselves to navigate their way back safely. He states that the impugned order was passed taking into consideration all these circumstances and that the restrictive timing fixed under the order is extremely reasonable and do not require any interference.

7. In response, Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan pleads that the hills are situated in the Western Ghats and sunlight is available much later than 04:00 PM, the time that has been fixed by the forest department. He adds that instead of commencing the trek through the forest at 07:00 AM, if the trek commences soon after the sunrise and ends before the sunset, it will give sufficient time for the devotees to ascend and descend.

8. I have carefully considered the submission on both sides and gone through the records.

9. Earlier, devotees like petitioner had approached this Court in WP.No.30169 of 2019 seeking permission to conduct pooja during the Tamil moth of ‘Karthikai’ and also to light the Maha Karthikai Deepam at the Vellingiri Swayambhu Eeswaran Temple. This Court, by way of an order, directed that the suitable season to visit the temple is during the months of March and April. It was further directed that a positive direction cannot be given by the Courts, so as to enable the devotees to visit the temple during the Tamil month of Karthikai and light lamps in the form of Karthikai Deepam.

10. A perusal of the order shows that it had been left to the discretion of the Forest Department to fix the timings. Such an order was passed taking into consideration that the area is a reserved forest teeming with wild animals.

11. The forest department has not totally shut-out the devotees from offering the prayer at the Vellingiri Swayambhu Eeswaran Temple. However, it has fixed the time between 07:00 AM to 04:00 PM. In my view, it has been over-cautious while fixing the time limit. Hence, taking into consideration the instructions that have been given to Dr.T.Seenivasan and order passed by this Court in W.P.No.30169 of 2019, Clause 10 of the impugned order is modified, by permitting the devotees to ascend the hills immediately after sunrise i.e., by 06:00 AM and to return/leave the forest area by 05:00 PM.

12. Needless to add, in case any devotee indulges in any non-forest activities, the Forest Department shall ensure that such persons are removed immediately and appropriate action, including imposition of fine and criminal prosecution, be initiated against such persons.

13. In result, the Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

 
  CDJLawJournal