logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 SC 293 print Preview print Next print
Court : Supreme Court of India
Case No : Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6470 of 2026
Judges: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SURYA KANT, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Parties : Himadri Speciality Chemicals Limited Versus Jindal Coke Limited
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioners: Jayant K Mehta, Sr. Advocate, Astha Sharma, AOR, Anju Thomas, Himanshu Chakravarty, Mansvini Jain, Advocates. For the Respondents: -----
Date of Judgment : 19-02-2026
Head Note :-
(Full Bench)
Summary :-
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- None

2. Catch Words:
Not mentioned.

3. Summary:
The Court heard the senior counsel for the petitioner at length. While acknowledging some arguable points, the Court chose not to intervene because an eminent Senior Advocate has already been appointed as the arbitrator and both parties are willing to proceed with arbitration. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed. The Court also ordered that any pending applications, if any, be disposed of. The decision underscores the Court’s reluctance to interfere in matters already slated for arbitration.

4. Conclusion:
Petition Dismissed
Judgment :-

1. We have heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner at considerable length.

2. Though he has made some arguable points, which might warrant this Court’s consideration in appropriate proceedings, we are not inclined to interfere in the instant matter for the reason that an eminent Senior Advocate has already been appointed as the learned Arbitrator and the parties are willing to arbitrate before her.

3. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

4. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed.

 
  CDJLawJournal