| |
CDJ 2025 Sikkim HC 029
|
| Court : High Court of Sikkim |
| Case No : WP(C) No.73 of 2025 |
| Judges: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI |
| Parties : Dr. Ruchita Bhujel Versus State Of Sikkim & Others |
| Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: Neha Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, R3, R4 & R5, Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Government Advocate, Pema Bhutia, Assistant Government Advocate, R2, Aarohi Bhalla, Senior Advocate, Bhusan Nepal, Advocate. |
| Date of Judgment : 12-12-2025 |
| Head Note :- |
| Subject |
| Summary :- |
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules / Orders Mentioned:
- Order dated 18-11-2025
2. Catch Words:
Not mentioned.
3. Summary:
The Court noted that Respondent No.1 filed a mention memo on 11‑12‑2025 and that Respondent No.2 (Sikkim Public Service Commission) filed I.A. No.02 of 2025 seeking disposal of the writ petition. The Court recalled its earlier Order dated 18‑11‑2025 in I.A. No.01 of 2025 directing that the petitioner be allowed to appear for the viva‑voce scheduled on 18‑20‑11‑2025, which was complied with. Since the petitioner has already been permitted to appear and has no further objection, the writ petition has become infructuous. Consequently, the petition is disposed of, and nothing restrains the Respondent from declaring the final results. All pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.
4. Conclusion:
Petition Dismissed |
| Judgment :- |
|
1. On Mention Memo being filed by the Respondent No.1 on 11-12-2025, this matter is taken up today.
2. I.A. No.02 of 2025 is an application filed on behalf of the Respondent No.2, Sikkim Public Service Commission (SPSC), seeking disposal of the instant Writ Petition.
3. It is submitted by Learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent No.2 that, this Court vide Order dated 18-11-2025, in I.A. No.01 of 2025, had directed the Respondent No.2 to permit the Petitioner to appear for the Viva-Voce which were scheduled to take place on 18-11-2025, 19-11-2025 and 20-11-2025. In compliance to the Order of this Court, the Petitioner was allowed to appear for the Viva-Voce and her interview conducted on 20-11-2025 along with other candidates. The final results of the said selection process is yet to be declared by the Respondent No.2. That, as all the prayers of the Petitioner before this Court were to permit her to appear in the Viva- Voce which has accordingly been complied with, this Writ Petition has thereby become infructuous and is liable to be disposed of.
4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner having been allowed to appear in the Viva-Voce, in terms of the prayers made in the Writ Petition and the I.A. No.01 of 2025, she has no objection to the submissions advanced by the Learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent No.2.
5. Considered submissions.
6. In light of the foregoing submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of as nothing further remains for adjudication.
7. In such circumstances, nothing restrains the Respondent No.2 from declaring the final results of the selection process.
8. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
|
| |
