| |
CDJ 2026 APHC 009
|
| Court : High Court of Andhra Pradesh |
| Case No : Criminal Petition No. 13126 of 2025 |
| Judges: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA |
| Parties : M/S. SG. Mediken & Others Versus The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh At Amaravati & Another |
| Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioners: L. Srinivasu, Advocate. For the Respondents: Public Prosecutor. |
| Date of Judgment : 20-12-2025 |
| Head Note :- |
| Criminal Procedure Code - Sections 482 - |
| Summary :- |
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- Section 437 of Cr.P.C
- Section 438 of Cr.P.C
- Section 439 of Cr.P.C
- Section 482 of Cr.P.C
- Section 528 of BNSS
- Section 18(a)(i) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
- Section 16(1)(a) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
- Section 17‑B(d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
- Section 17‑B(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
- Section 18(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
- Section 22(1) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
- Section 27(b)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
- Section 27(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
- Section 27(d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
- Section 19(3) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
2. Catch Words:
- Quashment
- Abuse of process
- Licence
- Distributor
- Manufacturer
3. Summary:
The petitioners, owners of licensed medical stores, filed a criminal petition under Section 528 of BNSS and Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of proceedings initiated under various sections of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. They argued that they are merely distributors, not manufacturers, and thus cannot be held liable. The court relied on a prior coordinate bench order (06.08.2024) which held that non‑manufacturers who acquire drugs from licensed manufacturers are not liable under the Act. Finding the continuation of criminal proceedings against the petitioners to be an abuse of process, the court quashed the proceedings against the accused.
4. Conclusion:
Petition Allowed |
| Judgment :- |
|
(Prayer: Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of the original certified copy of D.C.S.C.No.2 of 2020, dated on the file of Hon'ble I Additional District & Sessions Court, Chittoor) before this Hon’ble Court and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all and further proceedings in D.C.S.C.No. 2 of 2020 on the file of the Hon'ble | Additional District & Sessions Court, Chittoor, including appearance of the Petitioners/A-7 to A-10 pending disposal of the quash petition, and pass)
1. The instant petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed by the Petitioners / Accused Nos.7 to 110, seeking quashment of proceedings against them in D.C.S.C.No.2 of 2020 on the file of the Court of I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor for the offences under Sections 18(a)(i) read with Section 16(1)(a) and Section 17-B(d), 17-B(c), 18(c), 22(1) (cca)punishable under Sections 27(b)(ii), (c) and (d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.
2. Sri L.Srinivasu, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Petitioners are the owners of the medical stores having got valid licence for selling medicines. It is further submitted that the Petitioners are not the manufacturers of the alleged drug and that the Petitioners have nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel would further submit that the subject matter is squarely covered by the order dated 06.08.2024 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Crl.P.No.2928 of 2019, wherein, in the similar circumstances, the proceedings against Accused Nos.4 to 6 in C.C.No.68 of 2012 on the file of the Court of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, have been quashed. Learned counsel would further submit that the Petitioners herein, who are the Medical Store owners, are also on the same footing.
3. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
4. For ready reference, the relevant portion of the Order dated 06.08.2024 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Crl.P.No.2928 of 2019, is extracted hereunder:
“From the above, it is clear that if a person other than manufacturer proves that the drug was properly stored and acquired from the licensed manufacturer, he cannot be made liable. The manufacturer is responsible for the Product. It is not the case of the complainant that these petitioners had knowledge about the drug being not in conformity with standard quality. Further, it is not the case of the complainant that A-1 was not a licensed manufacturer. Since the petitioners are only distributors of the drug and dealing with the same, having acquired the same from a licensed manufacturer, in terms of the provisions of Section 19(3) of the Act, the proceedings against them cannot be permitted to continue for the aforementioned reasons.”
5. In the instant case also, the Petitioners herein are not the manufacturers of the subject drug and are running the Medical Stores with valid license for selling the medicines. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the light of the order referred to supra, this Court is of the view that continuation of the criminal proceedings against the Petitioners herein, who are not the manufacturers of the subject drug, is nothing but an abuse of process of Court. Therefore, it is a fit case for quashment of the proceedings against the Petitioners / Accused Nos.7 to 10.
6. According, this criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the Petitioners / Accused Nos.11 to 14 in D.C.S.C.No.2 of 2020 on the file of the Court of I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor, are hereby quashed.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
|
| |