logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide
24

  •            

 
CDJ 2025 SC 1983 print Preview print Next print
Court : Supreme Court of India
Case No : Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).3256/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-11-2024 in WA No.2079/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras]
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Parties : The Secretary to Government, Social Welfare & Nutritious Meal Programme (SW1) Department & Another Versus P. Perumal
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioners: Raju Ramachandran, Sr. Advocate, G. Indira, AOR, P. Gandepan, Anjali Singh, Raniba Pangnila, Mohammed Afeef, Shruti Narayan, Anurag Kashyap, Advocates. For the Respondent: R.S. Anandan, S.P. Patel, Abhishek Mishra, Advocates, Bhaskar Aditya, AOR
Date of Judgment : 11-12-2025
Head Note :-
Subject
Summary :-
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- None

2. Catch Words:
- Special Leave Petition
- Restoration
- Service benefits
- Retirement dues
- Pending applications

3. Summary:
The Court rejected the Special Leave Petition filed by the petitioner, thereby restoring the respondent to his position. The respondent is entitled to all benefits of service, including retirement and any pending dues as per the signed reportable order. The order also directs that any pending applications, if any, shall be disposed of. The judgment emphasizes that the respondent's rights under the service rules are fully reinstated. No further relief is granted to the petitioner. The decision is final and binding.

4. Conclusion:
Petition Dismissed
Judgment :-

The Special Leave Petition stands rejected, restoring the respondent; with all benefits of service, and retirement with every dues in terms of the signed reportable order.

2. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
 
  CDJLawJournal