logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 Utt HC 105 print Preview print Next print
Court : High Court of Uttarakhand
Case No : Writ Petition Criminal No. 1933 of 2026
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA
Parties : Mahak & Another Versus State Of Uttarakhand & Others
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioners: Alok Kumar, learned counsel. For the Respondents: Akshay Latwal, Pramod Tiwari, learned A.G.A. along with Manoj Bhatt, learned Brief Holder.
Date of Judgment : 21-09-2026
Head Note :-
Comparative Citation:
2026 UHC 8482,

Summary :-
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- Uniform Civil Code, Uttarakhand
- Rules (framed thereunder)

2. Catch Words:
- Life and personal liberty
- Protection
- Live‑in relationship
- Threat to life
- Police protection

3. Summary:
The petitioners, who are in a live‑in relationship and intend to marry, approached the Court fearing threats to their life and liberty from certain family members. The Court noted that the petitioners are living together voluntarily and that the issue of marital validity is not before it. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in *Lata Singh v. State of U.P.*, the Court directed the local police to assess any real threat and, if found, to provide appropriate protection. The Station House Officer was instructed to prevent any unlawful interference, intimidation, or coercion by the private respondents. No opinion was expressed on the validity of the marriage. The writ petition was disposed of after these directions.

4. Conclusion:
Petition Allowed
Judgment :-

(Oral)

1. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking protection so that they may lead a peaceful life.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are in a relationship with each other and have decided to marry each other, however, the private respondent no.3 to 7, who are father, brother, maternal uncles of petitioner no.1, are opposed to the relationship between the petitioners; and that, on account of such opposition, the petitioners apprehend threat to their life and personal liberty at the hands of the private respondents and have, therefore, approached this Court seeking protection of their life and personal liberty.

4. Both the petitioners are present before this Court and have been duly identified by their learned counsel. They state that they have been presently residing together in a live-in relationship with their own free will. The petitioners undertake to apply for registration of their live-in relationship in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Civil Code, Uttarakhand, and the Rules framed thereunder.

5. Be that as it may, it is not in dispute that the petitioners are presently living together voluntarily. The question of the validity or otherwise of their respective subsisting marriages, as well as any other civil consequences arising therefrom, is not being adjudicated upon in the present proceedings. The limited issue before this Court is confined to the protection of the life and personal liberty of the petitioners.

6. In the aforesaid circumstances, having regard to the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and Another, (2006) 5 SCC 475, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioners are entitled to protection of their life and personal liberty in accordance with law. Accordingly, in the event the petitioners approach the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police/Superintendent of Police, the concerned police authority shall ensure that no harm is caused to the life and personal liberty of the petitioners and shall take appropriate measures in accordance with law, if any threat to their life or personal liberty is brought to its notice.

7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the validity of the marriage or the inter se rights of the parties, the Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar, is directed to examine the representation of the petitioners and assess the threat perception, if any, to their life and personal liberty. In the event any real and imminent threat is found to exist, the concerned police authorities shall take appropriate measures to ensure adequate protection to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. The Station House Officer shall also ensure that no person, including the private respondents or any other individual, takes the law into his or her own hands or causes any unlawful interference, intimidation, harassment or coercion to the petitioners on account of their marriage.

8. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

9. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

 
  CDJLawJournal