logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 Ch HC 163 print Preview print Next print
Court : High Court of Chhattisgarh
Case No : MAC No. 366 of 2023
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR JAISWAL
Parties : Sonafulo Khadiya & Another Versus Chanddeep Mahto & Others
Appearing Advocates : For the Appellants: Anand Kesharwani, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, None, R3, Dashrath Gupta, Advocate.
Date of Judgment : 16-09-2026
Head Note :-
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 CGHC 40460,

Summary :-
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

2. Catch Words:
- Compensation
- Enhancement
- Conventional heads
- Loss of estate
- Funeral expenses
- Loss of consortium
- Interest

3. Summary:
The appellants challenged the award of Rs.14,49,632 by the 2nd Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, arguing that the conventional heads of compensation were not enhanced by the statutory 10% as required. The Tribunal had awarded Rs.1,10,000 under loss of estate, funeral expenses and loss of consortium. Applying the principle from *National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi*, the court recalculated the conventional heads to Rs.1,21,000, resulting in an additional entitlement of Rs.11,000 to the claimants. The court also directed that the additional amount bear interest at 6% per annum from filing to realization. All other terms of the original award remain unchanged. The court ordered the Registry to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimants in Hindi.

4. Conclusion:
Appeal Allowed
Judgment :-

1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, "the Act of 1988") by the appellants/claimants assailing the award dated 29.11.2022 passed by learned 2nd Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur (C.G.), in Claim Case No.459/2020, whereby the Tribunal has awarded a total compensation of Rs.14,49,632/- on account of the death of Sheela Khadiya, who succumbed to the injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 10.07.2020.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the Tribunal has failed to grant the requisite enhancement of 10% towards the conventional heads, namely loss of estate, funeral expenses, and consortium, in terms of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. It is, therefore, submitted that the compensation awarded under the conventional heads deserves suitable enhancement in accordance with the settled principles of law.

3. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3/Insurance Company supports the impugned award and submits that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just, fair and reasonable and does not warrant any interference by this Court.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at length, considered their rival submissions and carefully perused the entire record.

5. Upon perusal of the impugned award, it is evident that the Tribunal has awarded Rs.15,000/- towards loss of estate, Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses and Rs.40,000/- towards loss of consortium, aggregating to Rs.1,10,000/- under the conventional heads. Since the accident occurred on 10.07.2020, the claimants are entitled to an enhancement of 10% on the amounts payable under the conventional heads as per National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680. Accordingly, the amounts payable towards loss of estate and funeral expenses stand enhanced to Rs.16,500/- each, while the amount payable towards loss of consortium comes to Rs.44,000/-.

6. It is also not in dispute that there are two claimants. Hence, both the claimants shall be entitled towards loss of consortium of Rs.44,000/- each, totalling Rs.88,000/-.

7. Thus, the compensation payable under the conventional heads is recomputed as under:

Loss of Estate

Rs.16,500/-

Funeral Expenses

Rs.16,500/-

Loss of Consortium (Rs.44,000/- × 2)

Rs.88,000/-

Total

Rs.1,21,000/-

8. Since the Tribunal has already awarded Rs.1,10,000/- under the conventional heads, the appellants become entitled to an additional sum of Rs.11,000/- (1,21,000 - 1,10,000) under the said heads.

9. Consequently, the appellants/claimants shall be entitled to an additional/enhanced compensation of Rs.11,000/- over and above the amount awarded by the Tribunal. The enhanced amount shall carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of its actual realization. The remaining terms and conditions of the impugned award shall remain unaltered.

10. Accordingly, the appeal stands partly allowed and the impugned award is modified to the aforesaid extent.

11. The Registry is directed to communicate the claimants in writing "the enhanced/additional amount" in this appeal as against the award made by the concerned Tribunal. The said communication be made in Hindi Deonagri language and the help of paralegal workers may be availed with a co-ordination of Secretary, Legal Aid of the concerned area wherein the claimants reside.

 
  CDJLawJournal