logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 MHC 3505 print Preview print Next print
Court : High Court of Judicature at Madras
Case No : W.P. No. 20208 of 2026 & W.M.P. Nos. 21647 & 21648 of 2026
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN
Parties : M/s Aswin Cold Forge Private Ltd., Rep by its director S. Suseendhar, Chennai Versus The State Tax officer, Pattaravakkam Assessment Circle, Chennai
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: Ramasamy Swarnavel, Advocate. For the Respondent: P. Selvi, Government Advocate.
Date of Judgment : 21-05-2026
Head Note :-
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Summary :-
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- Article 226 of the Constitution of India
- Section 107 of the respective GST Enactments, 2017

2. Catch Words:
- limitation
- GST
- Show Cause Notice
- pre‑deposit
- bank attachment
- fresh order on merits
- expeditious disposal

3. Summary:
The writ petition under Article 226 challenges an order dated 04‑12‑2025 issued after a show‑cause notice. The petitioner failed to appear and now seeks quashing of the order. The court notes that the limitation period for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act has expired. With the petitioner’s consent to pre‑deposit 25 % of the disputed tax, the matter is remitted to the respondent to pass a fresh order, subject to the deposit within 30 days and filing a reply to the show‑cause notice. If the petitioner complies, the bank attachment will be lifted and a final order must be issued within three months; otherwise, recovery proceedings will continue. The petition is disposed of without costs, and related miscellaneous petitions are closed.

4. Conclusion:
Petition Dismissed
Judgment :-

(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in reference No.ZD3312250699438 dated 04.12.2025 for the financial year 2021 2022, quash the same and direct the Respondent to adjudicate the issue in accordance with law by providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner.)

1. Mrs. P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.

2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 04.12.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in Form DRC-01 dated 19.07.2025 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. However, the Petitioner did not take advantage of the same and, has thus suffered the impugned Order dated 04.12.2025.

4. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST Enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired long before. However, the present Writ Petition has been filed only on 19.05.2026.

5. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 25% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication.

6. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made the following endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:

                   “I may be permitted to pay 25% of the Tax amount"

7. Recording the above consent given by the Petitioner, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in Form DRC-01 dated 19.07.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 04.12.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 19.07.2025.

9. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated.

10. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

11. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

12. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

13. Any amount recovered or already paid by the Petitioner shall be adjusted towards the disputed tax.

14. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

 
  CDJLawJournal