logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 GHC 213 print Preview print Next print
Court : High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
Case No : R/Criminal Misc.Application (For Regular Bail - Before Chargesheet) No. 12004 Of 2026
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI
Parties : Mehulbhai Versus State Of Gujarat
Appearing Advocates : For the Applicant: Maulik M. Soni(7249), Advocate. For the Respondent: Dhawan Jayswal, Public Prosecutor.
Date of Judgment : 25-05-2026
Head Note :-
Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(e), 81, 98(2) and 116-B -
Summary :-
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
- Sections 65(e), 81, 98(2) and 116‑B of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949

2. Catch Words:
- regular bail
- discretion
- personal bond
- surety
- conditions of bail
- surrender of passport
- restriction on travel
- monthly police verification

3. Summary:
The applicant filed an application under Section 439 CrPC seeking regular bail for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The State opposed, labeling the offences serious. The Court examined the facts, noting the applicant’s incarceration since 04‑05‑2026, completion of investigation, lack of prior record, and alleged involvement in illegal liquor transport. Considering these circumstances, the Court exercised its discretion and granted regular bail. The applicant was ordered to execute a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety, subject to specific conditions including passport surrender, travel restrictions, residence reporting, and monthly police verification. The order also empowered the trial court to modify conditions and warned that breach would invite warrant issuance.

4. Conclusion:
Petition Allowed
Judgment :-

Oral Order

1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent - State.

2. By this application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant is seeking release on regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11821048260548 of 2026, registered with Sukhsar Police Station, District: Dahod, for the offences punishable under Sections 65(e), 81, 98(2) and 116-B of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that, the applicant is not involved in commission of offence as alleged in the FIR and therefore, looking to the role of the applicant and nature of the allegations, the applicant is required to be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable terms and conditions.

4. On the other hand, learned APP appearing for the respondent - State vehemently submits that, the offences, which have been charged, are serious in nature affecting the society at large and looking to the facts as well as the allegations made against the applicant, no discretion would be required to be exercised.

5. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegations, this Court is of the opinion that, discretion is required to be exercised to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. This Court has considered the following facts while exercising discretion in favour of the applicant :-

          (i) the applicant is in jail since 04.05.2026;

          (ii) though, the charge-sheet is not filed, the investigation is substantially over;

           (iii) no past antecedent;

          (iv) the applicant is alleged to have been instrumental in illegal transportation of the liquor;

6. In view of the aforesaid facts, without discussing the evidence in detail, this Court, prima facie, is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, present application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11821048260548 of 2026, registered with Sukhsar Police Station, District: Dahod, on executing personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

          [a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

          [b] not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the prosecution;

          [c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

          [d] not leave India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

          [e] furnish latest address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the trial Court;

          [f] mark his presence before the concerned police station in the first week of every month till the trial is over;

7. The Authorities will release the applicant only if the applicant is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the learned Lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. At the trial, learned Trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

8. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

 
  CDJLawJournal