logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide
24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 Ker HC 668 print Preview print Next print
Court : High Court of Kerala
Case No : RCREV. No. 98 of 2026
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.M. SYAM KUMAR
Parties : Ayadathil Nazar Versus Keeppilacheri Abdul Razak & Another
Appearing Advocates : For the Appearing Parties: P. Shanes Methar, N. Krishna Prasad, A. Mohammed Faizal, V.S. Harkish Sreethu, P.V. Arjun, Advocates.
Date of Judgment : 05-05-2026
Head Note :-
Subject -
Summary :-
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- Not mentioned.

2. Catch Words:
- Revision petition
- Eviction
- Notice
- Speed post
- Returnable within 10 days

3. Summary:
The revision petition filed by Ayadathil Nazar seeks a 16‑month period to vacate the premises. The petitioner’s counsel argued that this period would satisfy his client. The court examined the submissions and, instead of granting an immediate eviction order, directed the petitioner to serve a notice to the respondents via speed post. The notice is to be returned within ten days from the date of posting, which is fixed as 20‑05‑2026. This procedural direction aims to give the respondents an opportunity to respond before any further orders are passed.

4. Conclusion:
Petition Allowed
Judgment :-

Ayadathil Nazar Versus Keeppilacheri Abdul Razak & Another

For the Appearing Parties: P. Shanes Methar, N. Krishna Prasad, A. Mohammed Faizal, V.S. Harkish Sreethu, P.V. Arjun, Advocates.

Even though there are various assertions and allegations made and urged in this revision petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner - Sri, P. Shanes Methar, submitted that, his client, if granted 16 months to evict himself, will be satisfied.

Adverting to the afore plea, we directed the petitioner to take out notice to the respondents by speed post, returnable within 10 days.

                  Post on 20.05.2026.
 
  CDJLawJournal