logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 SC 488 print Preview print Next print
Court : Supreme Court of India
Case No : Civil Appeal No. 2786 of 2022
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
Parties : Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company Private Limited (Aarc) Versus Raju Chappakal Pappu & Others
Appearing Advocates : For the Appellants: Navin Pahwa, Sr. Advocate, Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR, Karan Batura, Tanvi Sapra, Anmol Srivastava, Yuvraj Kashyap, Advocates. For the Respondents: A.K. Sangal, Sr. Advocate, Jagrati Singh, AOR, Devender Kumar Saini, Vikram Saini, Sidarth Sangal, Rajpal, Surendar Kumar, Omprakash, R.S. Meena, Richa Mishra, Ashu Kansal, Divyanshu Rai, AOR, Sugandha Batra, Vishal Sharma, Taruna, Shubh Gautam, Vansh Bhatnagar, Advocates.
Date of Judgment : 01-04-2026
Head Note :-
Subject
Summary :-
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules / Orders / Regulations / Sections Mentioned:
- None

2. Catch Words:
Not mentioned.

3. Summary:
The bench heard the matter and reserved its judgment. After reserving, it was discovered that Hon’ble Justice K.V. Viswanathan had previously acted as counsel for the appellant in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the principal borrower. In view of this conflict, the court recalled the order dated 17‑03‑2026 passed in Civil Appeal No. 2786/2022. The matter is to be listed before another bench as directed by the Chief Justice of India.

4. Conclusion:
Appeal Dismissed
Judgment :-

1. This matter was heard finally and the judgment was reserved.

2. After the judgment came to be reserved, it has come to the notice of Hon’ble K.V.Viswanathan, J. is that His Lordship had appeared as a counsel for the appellant herein in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Principal borrower (corporate debtor).

3. In such circumstances, the order dated 17.3.2026 passed in Civil Appeal No.2786/2022 is recalled.

4. Let this matter be listed before any other bench as may be directed by Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India.

 
  CDJLawJournal