1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 06.11.2025 in connection with S.T. Case No. 71 of 2025 arising out of Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 10 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned Principal District cum Sessions Judge Ramgarh.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the daughter of the informant was found dead in her matrimonial home but the marriage was solemnized in the year 2015 and the incident has occurred in 2025. He has further submitted that the petitioner is a father-in-law and the husband has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this court in B.A. No. 7489 of 2025 vide order dated 25.09.2025. He has also submitted that as per the FIR, there is allegation of torture but so far as post mortem report is concerned, there is no antemortem injury and the deceased died of asphyxia due to hanging. The petitioner is in custody since 06.11.2025. Charge sheet has been submitted and the case is pending for framing of charge.

4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that two neighbors of the victim have supported the prosecution case in as much as they stated that regular quarrel used to take place in the house of the petitioner.

5. During the course of hearing, it also transpired that one audio clip was found but the case diary does not reveal that the same was ever sent for any forensic examination.

6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased aged 71 years and there is no antemortem injury found in the body of the deceased and the husband of the deceased has already been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principal District cum Sessions Judge Ramgarh in connection with S.T. Case No. 71 of 2025 arising out of Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 10 of 2025 on the following conditions:

                  (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

                  (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

                  (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

                  (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.

                  (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.

7. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.

8. State is directed to ensure prompt production of witnesses as and when trial commences.

9. Learned counsel for the State is directed to communicate this order to the State and also to the Director, Prosecution to ensure compliance.

10. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.