1. Heard Sri.K.S.Murthy, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for respondent No.1, Sri.M.Arun Kumar, learned standing counsel for GHMC appearing for respondent No.2, learned standing counsel for Central Government appearing for respondent No.3, learned Government Pleader for Cooperative Societies appearing for respondent No.4 and Sri.R.N.Hemendranath Reddy, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of counsel for the respondent No.5. With their consent, the writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This writ petition has being filed seeking the following prayer:-

               “to declare the inaction on the part of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 particularly Respondent No.2 in failing to take necessary action against the illegal constructions and unauthorized activities carried on by Respondent No.5 Society as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and a colourable exercise and misuse of power purportedly under the provisions of the Greater Municipal Corporation Act and the allied municipal laws and rules being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and the principles of natural justice apart from violation of Section 48 of Telangana Co-operatives Societies Act and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 particularly Respondent No.2 to initiate immediate and appropriate action in accordance with law including

               i) demolition of the illegal and unauthorized constructions

               ii) seizure of the restaurant and other unauthorized commercial activities and

               iii) stay and prohibition of commercial events including the India Art. Festival being conducted in the community centre on 3rd April, 2026 to 5th April, 2026.”

3. Brief facts as stated in this writ petition are that the petitioners are the members of the respondent No.5 society. The respondent No.5 society made an application dated 05.03.2011, seeking permission for constructions of community hall in Sy.No.403(O) 120 (N), Shaikpet and the respondent No.2 vide Building Permit Order bearing No.29201/HO/CZ/Cir-10/2013 dated 01.11.2013, granted permission for construction of sub-cellar, cellar for parking and two upper floors exclusively for a community hall for the use of respondent No.5 society members. In the year 2019, one Sri.P.Virendranath Choudary, questioning the construction of a commercial centre/community hall by the respondent No.5 filed W.P.No.1832 of 2019 and this Court vide order dated 06.06.2019 in W.P.No.1832 of 2019 observed that the building permission was granted only for construction of community hall and not for the commercial purpose and disposed of the writ petition directing to remove the constructions made in the greenbelt area.

4. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners has drawn attention of this Court to the building permit order dated 01.11.2013, wherein construction permission was granted for the purpose of the community hall, however, the respondent No.5 is using the community hall for the commercial purpose. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners on 17.10.2025 made a detailed representation and requested the respondent No.2 to inspect the subject property and take action against unauthorized commercial use of the community centre, however, the same was kept pending for consideration. Thereafter, the petitioners’ on 14.11.2025 and 29.11.2025 made representations before the respondent Nos.2 and 4, however, the same are also kept pending. Aggrieved by the pending consideration, this writ petition is filed.

5. Though various grounds are raised in this writ petition, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners would pray this Court to direct the respondent Nos.2 and 4 to consider the petitioners’ representations dated 14.11.2025 and 29.11.2025 and pass orders in a time bound period.

6. Learned standing counsel appearing for respondent No.2 and learned Government Pleader for Cooperative Societies appearing for respondent No.4 submits that if petitioners’ representations dated 14.11.2025 and 29.11.2025 are still pending for consideration, the respondent authorities would pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

7. Learned senior counsel appearing for respondent No.5 did not dispute the same.

8. Recording the submission made by learned counsel appearing on either side and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent Nos.2 and 4 to consider the petitioners’ representations dated 14.11.2025 and 29.11.2025 and after issuing notice and after giving fair opportunity of hearing to the concerned parties shall pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (03) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioners.

9. It is clarified that in the event of respondent Nos.6 and 7 are otherwise aggrieved may avail remedy of filing application for the modification of this order, in accordance with law.

10. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.