logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide
24

  •            

 
CDJ 2025 MHC 8281 print Preview print print
Court : High Court of Judicature at Madras
Case No : CRL RC No. 340 of 2021
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR
Parties : G. Ponnusamy Versus M. Shanmugavadivel
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: R. Baskar, Advocate. For the Respondent: M. Ganesh, N. Manoharan, Advocates.
Date of Judgment : 10-12-2025
Head Note :-
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 397 r/w 401 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) MWN(Cr) DCC 77,
Judgment :-

(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., 1973 praying to call for the records and set aside the order and judgment dated 16.04.2021 in C.A.No.91 of 2016 passed by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur, thereby dismissing the appeal and confirming the order and judgment of conviction and sentence dated 22.07.2016 in C.C.No.379 of 2009 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Avinashi, acquit the petitioner.)

1. The petitioner/Accused in C.C.No.379 of 2009 was convicted by the trial Court by the judgment dated 22.07.2016 for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act ('N.I. Act') and sentenced to undergo six months simple imprisonment and to pay the cheque amount of Rs.8,00,000/- as compensation. Aggrieved against the same, the petitioner filed an appeal before the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur in Crl.A.No.91 of 2016. The learned Sessions Judge, by the judgment dated 16.04.2021 dismissed the appeal confirming the conviction of the trial Court, against which, the present revision is filed.

2. During the pendency of the revision, the matter was referred to the National Lok Adalat held by this Court on 13.09.2025. In the Lok Adalat, the parties arrived at a settlement and the respondent/complainant agreed to receive a further sum of Rs.5,00,000/- in full quit. The Terms of Settlement reads as follows:

               

3. Recording the submission of the parties, the Criminal Revision Case was disposed of by the Lok Adalat and for setting aside the conviction, the case was posted before this Court.

4. Today, the petitioner is present before this Court and he handed over a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- by way of Demand Draft. The learned counsel for the respondent received the Demand Draft and acknowledged receipt of the same. The Demand Draft is scanned hereunder:

               

5. In view of the compliance of the Lok Adalat order dated 13.09.2025, the judgment of conviction passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Avinashi dated 22.07.2016 in C.C.No.379 of 2009 and confirmed by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur, dated 16.04.2021 in Crl.A.No.91 of 2016 are set aside. The petitioner is acquitted from all charges.

6. The compliance is recorded.
 
  CDJLawJournal