1. This Criminal Petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 25.11.2025 passed by the learned I Additional Sessions Judge at Nizamabad in Crl.M.P. No. 1107 of 2025, whereby the petition filed by the State for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted in favour of the petitioner on 19.06.2025 in Crl.M.P. No. 562 of 2025 was allowed.

2. Heard Mr. G.Bhaskar Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr.P.Suman, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence and has been falsely implicated in the present crime. The petitioner filed a petition for grant of anticipatory bail vide Crl.M.P. No. 562 of 2025, and the said petition was allowed by the learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Nizamabad, on 19.06.2025. Subsequently, due to non-compliance of condition No.1 imposed by the trial Court in Crl.M.P. No. 562 of 2025 i.e., directing the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer on the 1 st and 15th of every month between 10:00 AM and 1:00 PM, the State filed a petition vide Crl.M.P.No.1107 of 2025 seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail, even though the petitioner has complied with the said condition.

4. Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner had not appeared before the Investigating Officer and had not complied with condition No. 1 imposed in Crl.M.P. No. 562 of 2025, and that the trial Court had rightly cancelled the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner. He further submitted that, in the event that the petitioner complies with condition No. 1 imposed by the trial Court, the impugned order may be set aside.

5. Having considered the rival submissions made by the respective parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, it reveals that the trial Court initially granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner on 19.06.2025 in Crl.M.P. No. 562 of 2025. Subsequently, the said bail was cancelled on 25.11.2025 basing upon the petition filed by the State in Crl.M.P. No. 1107 of 2025 on the sole ground that the petitioner had not complied with condition No.1 imposed by the trial Court in Crl.M.P.No.562 of 2025. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had complied with condition No.1 and appeared before the Investigating Officer on each and every date pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2025.

6. In the absence of any iota of evidence produced by either of the parties, this Court cannot come to a conclusion as to whether the petitioner appeared on the particular dates or not, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2025. Therefore, the impugned order passed by the learned trial Court on 25.11.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.1107 of 2025 is set aside. The petitioner is directed to file a sworn affidavit before the learned trial Court in Crl.M.P.No.1107 of 2025 stating that he will comply with condition No.1 as imposed in Crl.M.P.No.562 of 2025. In default of the same, the trial Court is entitled to proceed with the matter in accordance with law.

7. Accordingly, the criminal petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.