1. Heard.

2. Leave granted.

3. Appellant has been arraigned as an accused in FIR No.166 of 2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 329(1), 329(4), 62, 351(3), 305 and 190 of the Bharatiya Nayaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS, 2023) alleging that he had, alongwith other co-accused, tresspassed into the house of the complainant and committed theft of articles lying in the house. The house is said to be in possession of the complainant on the basis of an agreement to sell dated 06.08.2025.

4. The appellant has been unsuccessful before the trial court and the High Court. In other words, prayer for bail has been rejected. This Court while issuing notice on 08.01.2026 granted an interim protection namely from any coercive steps being taken against the appellant subject to the appellant cooperating with the investigation.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the State would fairly submit that appellant has appeared before the Investigating Officer (IO) though not fully cooperating with the investigation.

6. Not answering to the questions of the IO, would not ipso facto mean there is non-cooperation. Hence, we do not propose to go into that aspect and it would suffice to note that the appellant has appeared before the IO pursuant to the interim protection granted and there being a civil dispute between the parties with regard to immovable property and also the fact that the other co-accused have been already granted bail, we are of the considered view that appellant is also entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

7. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. Impugned order is set aside. Appellant is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail on such terms and conditions as the jurisdictional IO may deem fit to impose and also on the condition that the appellant would appear before the trial court on all dates of hearing except when exempted for any specific reason.

8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.