logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide
24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 MHC 651 print Preview print print
Court : Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
Case No : W.P. (MD). No. 2720 of 2026 & W.M.P. (MD). No. 2310 & 2313 of 2026
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Parties : Oasis Inn International Pvt Ltd., Represented by its Director A. Mani, Kanniyakumari Versus The Assistant Commissioner(st), Kuzhithurai Assessment Circle, Kanniyakumari
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: S. Kannan, Advocate. For the Respondent: R. Suresh Kumar, AGP.
Date of Judgment : 03-02-2026
Head Note :-
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Judgment :-

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned Order in GSTIN No. 33AABCO9598F2Z2 bearing a Ref No. ZA3309240820799 dated 12.09.2024 issued by the Respondent and quash the same, and further direct the Respondent to restore the GST registration of the Petitioner vide GSTIN No. 33AABCO9598F2Z2.)

1. This writ petition has been filed challenging impugned order dated 12.09.2024 passed by the respondent.

2. Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to financial problems, no returns were filed by the petitioner continuously for a period of 6 months. Under these circumstances, the GST Registration of the petitioner was cancelled by the respondent vide order dated 12.09.2024.

5. Further, he would submit that now, the petitioner is willing to file his GST returns and pay the entire tax liabilities along with applicable interest and penalty, if any. Hence, he requests this Court to revoke the order passed by the respondent for cancellation of GST Registration of the petitioner.

6. In reply, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent confirms that the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled by the respondent vide impugned order dated 12.09.2024 and requests this Court to pass an appropriate order.

7. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record.

8. In this case, the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled by the respondent vide the impugned order dated 12.09.2024. According to the petitioner, due to financial problems, he was unable to file GST returns for a period of 6 months. Under these circumstances, the GST Registration was cancelled by the respondent vide impugned order dated 12.09.2024. In such case, the reason assigned by the petitioner, in the considered opinion of this Court, appears to be genuine.

9. In view of the above, this Court is inclined to revoke the impugned order dated 12.09.2024 passed by the respondent canceling the GST registration of the petitioner. The cancellation of registration is hereby revoked, subject to the fulfillment of the following conditions:

                     (i) The respondent shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow the petitioner to file the returns and to pay the tax/penalty/fine, within a period of four weeks therefrom.

                     (ii) The petitioner is directed to file returns for the period till date, if not filed, together with tax dues along with interest thereon and the fee fixed for belated filing of returns within a period of 4 weeks from the date of restoration of GST Registration of the petitioner.

                     (iii) It is made clear that such payment of tax, interest, fine/fee etc. shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit (ITC) which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of the petitioner.

                     (iv) If any ITC has remained unutilized, it shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate or competent officer of the Department.

                     (v) Only such approved ITC shall be allowed to be utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liability under the Act and Rules.

                     (vi) If any ITC was earned, it shall be allowed to be utilised only after scrutinising and approving by the respondent or any other competent authority.

                     (vii) If any of the aforesaid conditions is not complied with by the petitioner, the benefit granted under this order will automatically ceased to operate.

10. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
 
  CDJLawJournal