logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 Kar HC 027 print Preview print print
Court : High Court of Karnataka
Case No : Writ Petition No. 39354 Of 2025 (GM-CPC)
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR
Parties : P. Suraj Versus M/s. Sourberry E & P LLP, Represented By Its Chief Executive Officer, Naveen Prem, Bangalore & Others
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: Vikram Huilgol, Sernior Advocate, Shreeram Timmappa Nayak, Advocate. For the Respondents: B. Manjunath, Advocate.
Date of Judgment : 12-01-2026
Head Note :-
Constitution of India  - Articles 226 & 227 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 KHC 1660,
Judgment :-

(Prayer: This WP is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus or such other appropriate writs and allow IA No.2 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 in Com A.A.No.494/2025 by LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Court Unit at Bengaluru (CCH-87) at Annexure - A, in the interest of justice and equity and etc.)

Oral Order

1. In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

          "(a) Issue a writ of mandamus or such other appropriate writs and allow IA No.2 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 in Com A.A.No.494/2025 BY LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Court Unit at Bengaluru (CCH-87) at Annexure-A in the interest of justice and equity.

          (b) Consequently grant an order of temporary injunction restraining the respondents along with his agents, supporters, representatives, henchmen etc., from operating the operations of the Limited Liability Partnership in the name and style of "SOURBERRY E & P LLP" (hereinafter referred to as "LLP") as per the provisions of Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 registered in the Registrar of Companies, Karnataka at Bengaluru vide Registration No. LLPIN: AAY-7252 in the Application Schedule Property, until disposal of the above application and pass other suitable orders.

          (c) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case."

2. Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner would reiterate and submit that while the Commercial Court has passed an ad interim exparte order of temporary injunction on IA No.1/2025, the Commercial Court has directed issuance of emergent notice on IA No.2/2025 and as such, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the present petition. It is submitted that the petitioner has already made submissions on both IA No.1/2025 and IA No.2/2025 in Com.A.A.No.494/2025, which presently stands posted before the Commercial Court on 21.01.2026 and as such, the Commercial Court may be directed to dispose of both IA No.1/2025 and IA No.2/2025 within a stipulated time frame.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents would appear before the Commercial Court on 21.01.2026 and file objections, documents, etc., and the Commercial Court may be directed to dispose of the applications in accordance with law.

5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and joint submissions made by both sides, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this petition by directing the Commercial Court to consider and pass appropriate orders on IA No.1/2025 and IA No.2/2025 in Com.A.A.No.494/2025, in accordance with law within a period of ten days from 21.01.2026.

6. All rival contentions on all aspects of the matter including merits / demerits of the rival contentions of both sides are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same.

 
  CDJLawJournal