logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide
24

  •            

 
CDJ 2025 Kar HC 1914 print Preview print print
Court : High Court of Karnataka
Case No : Writ Petition No. 36518 of 2025 (EDN-RES)
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR
Parties : T.K. Varsha Versus Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sciences, Bangalore, Represented By Registrar & Others
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: A K Vasantha, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, Mamatha Kulkarni, R2, N.K. Ramesh, Advocates, R4, K. Manjunath, HCGP.
Date of Judgment : 08-12-2025
Head Note :-
Constitution of India – Articles 226 and 227 – Mandamus – Consideration of Representation – Medical Education – B.D.S. Course – Writ Petition – Petitioner sought direction to respondents to consider representations dated 22.11.2025 for enabling continuation of B.D.S. course by accepting requisite fees – Representations remained unconsidered – Court held respondents agreed to consider the same if reasonable time granted – Writ disposed of with directions.

Court Held – Writ Petition disposed of – Respondents No.1 and 2 directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on petitioner’s representations dated 22.11.2025 – Grievances to be addressed in accordance with law – Time limit of one week prescribed from date of order for compliance.

[Paras 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Keywords: Articles 226 & 227 – Writ of Mandamus – Representation Consideration – B.D.S. Course – Medical Education – University Authorities – Direction to Decide – Karnataka High Court


Comparative Citation:
2025 KHC 51586,
Judgment :-

(Prayer: This W.P. is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the r-1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner Dtd. 22.11.2025 vide Annx-B and c so as to enable the petitioners to pursue her further studies in B.D.S. course pursing in r-3 college by accepting the necessary fees towards the said purpose.)

Oral Order:

1. In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

                  a)       Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/s, order/s, direction/s directing the respondents No.1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.11.2025 vide Annexures-B and C so as to enable the petitioner to pursue her further studies in B.D.S. course pursuing in 3rd respondent college by accepting the necessary fees towards the said purpose.

                  b)       Issue any such orders as this Honourable Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case, to meet the ends of justice."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representations at 'Annexures - B and C' submitted by the petitioner have not been considered by respondents No.1 and 2 even till today and as such petitioner is before this Court by way of the present petition.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 submits that, if reasonable time is granted, respondent No.2 shall consider and take appropriate decision/pass appropriate orders on the representations at 'Annexures - B and C' submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law.

4. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and submissions made by both sides, I deem it just and appropriate to direct respondents No.1 and 2 to consider and pass appropriate orders by addressing the grievances of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of one week from today.

5. Subject to the aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of.
 
  CDJLawJournal