logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2025 MHC 7142 print Preview print print
Court : Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
Case No : CRL OP(MD)No. 22397 of 2025
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SRIMATHY
Parties : Murugesan Versus The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Tenkasi
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: C. Saravanakumar, Advocate. For the Respondent: E. Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor.
Date of Judgment : 11-12-2025
Head Note :-
Juvenile Justice JJ Act, 2015 - Section 77 -
Judgment :-

(Prayer: For Bail in Crime No.621 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.)

The Court made the following order:-

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 20.11.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 24(1) of Cigarette and other Tobacco Products (COTPA) Act, 2003 and Section 77 of the Juvenile Justice JJ Act, 2015, in Crime No.621 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that accused were found in possession of 525 kilograms of banned tobacco products. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 20.11.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that five previous cases of a similar nature are pending against the petitioner. Therefore, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. This Court directed the prosecution to produce the accused/A-2, who is in jail as well as the wife/A-1 of the accused. Both have expressed the hazardous nature of ‘coolip’ and further directed them to submit an undertaking, written in their own handwriting, stating that they will not sell any tobacco or coolip products in the future. The same is extracted hereunder:

“image”

6. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, the undertaking filed by the accused persons and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam, Tenkasi District, and on further conditions that :-

               [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

               [b] the petitioner shall make a non refundable deposit of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand only) to the credit of The Head Master, Government Higher Secondary School, Odaipatty, Theni District, in SBI Account No. 11268003539, IFSC No.SBIN0000764, State Bank of India, South Car Street, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. This fund shall be utilized for the purpose of purchasing furniture (Benches & Desks) for newly constructed class rooms under ''Namakku Name'' Scheme, without prejudice to his contentions and rights before the trial Court, and on such deposit being made, the learned Judicial Magistrate shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner;

               [c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

               [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

               [e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

               [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

                   [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

 
  CDJLawJournal