logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 DHC 683 My Notes print Preview print print
Court : High Court of Delhi
Case No : Bail Appln. No. 3614 of 2026
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Parties : Abhishek @ Abhi Versus State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: Harsh Kumar Pandey, Seyeet Kumar Mishra, Advocates. For the Respondent: Amit Ahlawat, APP.
Date of Judgment : 09-10-2026
Head Note :-
BNS - Section 115(2)/126(2)/76/351(3)/3(5) -

Comparative Citation:
2026 DHC 8959,

Judgment :-

Judgment (Oral)

1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No.224/2026 of PS Maidan Garhi for offence under Section 115(2)/126(2)/76/351(3)/3(5) BNS.

2. Status report has not been filed on behalf of State.

3. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that along with his family members, he assaulted the complainant de facto with iron rods and dandas causing injuries on head and other parts of body. It is also alleged that in the course of the said assault, brother of the accused/applicant tore away clothes of wife of the complainant de facto.

4. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that he is in custody since 17.07.2026 and is suffering with unstable mind. It is also submitted that even wife of the accused/applicant is unable to meet him because the accused/applicant is also suffering with Tuberculosis. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the present case is a counter blast to FIR No. 0223/2026 registered by PS Maidan Garhi on the complaint of the co-accused Sandeep.

5. Learned APP for State, assisted by IO/ASI Rajbir Singh, submits that the injured complainant de facto was discharged from hospital on the day of occurrence itself and that the injuries suffered by him were found to be simple in nature. It is submitted that chargesheet has already been filed.

6. Keeping in mind the overall circumstances, especially the non-filing of status report, which conveys that State has no serious objection to this bail application, coupled with the fact that the injured was discharged from hospital on the same day after treatment of his simple injuries, the bail application is allowed.

7. The accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

8. A copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the concerned Jail Superintendent for informing the accused/applicant.

 
  CDJLawJournal