logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 MHC 6126 My Notes print Preview print print
Court : High Court of Judicature at Madras
Case No : CMA. No. 2430 of 2026
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Parties : Sarathi Versus Sangeetha & Another
Appearing Advocates : For the Appellant: S.P. Yuaraj, Advocate. For the Respondents: R2, R. Sreevidhya, Advocate.
Date of Judgment : 04-08-2026
Head Note :-
Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 - Section 173 -
Judgment :-

(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 to enhance the compensation amount made in the fair order dated 16.10.2024 made in MCOP No.731 of 2022 on the file of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Subordinate Court, Kirshnagiri, by allowing this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and thus render justice.)

1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the award passed by Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Subordinate Court, Kirshnagiri dated 16.10.2024 in MCOP No.731 of 2022 seeking for enhancement of compensation.

2. The case of the claimant is that he was riding a two wheeler on the Uthangarai – Samalpatti road on 03.09.2022 and at about 8.00 p.m, near Veeriampatti Junction road, the offending vehicle, which was also a two wheeler, was driven in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the two wheeler, in which the claimant was travelling. As a result of which, the claimant fell down and sustained a major crush injury to the right lower limb with grade IIIC open fracture of right proximal tibia with popliteal artery injury. The claimant underwent treatment as an inpatient for nearly 10 days in two spells. An operation was performed, which led to right above knee amputation. An FIR came to be registered in Crime No.400 of 2022 against the rider of the offending vehicle. It is under these circumstances, the claim petition came to be filed before the Tribunal.

3. The Tribunal on considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence came to a conclusion that the accident had taken place only due to the rash and negligent driving on the rider of the offending two wheeler.

4. Having rendered such a finding, the Tribunal proceeded to fix the total compensation at Rs.37,21,000/- under the following heads :-

Sl. No.

Compensation awarded under the head

Amount (in Rs.)

1.

Future loss of earning capacity

Rs.18,14,400/-

2.

Medical expenses

Rs.7,90,000/-

3.

Pain and suffering

Rs.1,50,000/-

4.

Transportation expenses

Rs.15,000/-

5.

Additional Nourishment

Rs.25,000/-

6

Damages to cloths

Rs.1,600/-

7

Attender charges

Rs.25,000/-

8

Loss of amenities

Rs.2,00,000/-

9.

Future medical expenses

Rs.7,00,000/-

Total

Rs.37,21,000/-

5. The above compensation was directed to be paid with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum. Aggrieved by the same, the claimant has filed this appeal seeking for enhancement of compensation.

6. Heard Mr.S.P.Yuvaraj, learned counsel for appellant and Mrs.R.Sreevidhya, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent.

7. This Court carefully considered the submissions made on the side of the appellant and the materials available on record.

8. This Court also carefully went through the award passed by the Tribunal.

9. In the case in hand, the claimant has sustained grievous injuries resulting in right above knee amputation. The medical board had assessed the disability at 85% under Ex.C1. The Medical Board had observed that the petitioner had pain and deformity in right hip, loss of right lower limb, difficulty in stability component, stumping, scarring, sensation decreased in injured areas. The Tribunal also took into consideration the fact that the claimant had purchased a prosthesis. Accordingly, the Tribunal fixed the functional disability at 50% and applied the multiplier method, while fixing the notional monthly income at Rs.1,44,000/-.

10. In the considered view of this Court, the claimant was aged about 20 years and he had suffered above knee amputation in the right leg, He has to live his life with the help of prosthetic leg. Considering the fact that the accident had taken place in the year 2022, this Court is inclined to fix the notional monthly income at Rs.17,000/- and considering the age of the claimants, 40% can be added towards future prospects. The Tribunal has fixed only 50% towards functional disability and this Court is inclined to fixed 85% towards functional disability based on Ex.C1. Consequently, the compensation under the head of loss of disability is calculated as follows :-

Monthly Income

:

Rs. 17,000/-

(+) 40% future prospects

:

Rs. 6,800/-

--------------------------

Rs. 23,800/-

x 12

------------------

Annual income

:

Rs. 2,85,600/-

Multiplier

:

x 18

------------------

:

Rs.51,40,800/-

------------------

Loss of earning Capacity

=

Rs.51,40,800/- x 85%

=

Rs.43,69,680/-

11. This Court is inclined to inclined to enhance the compensation under the head of pain and sufferings to Rs.2,00,000/-, Transportation expenses to Rs.25,000/- and Extra Nourishment to Rs.70,000/-.

12. The Tribunal has fixed a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- towards future medical expenses. This has been done without any supporting material and the prosthetic legs would require maintenance and therefore, this Court is inclined to fix a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- under this head.

13. The compensation fixed under the other heads are just and reasonable and it does not require the interference of this Court.

14. In the light of the above discussion, this Court modifies the compensation in the following manner:

Sl.No.

Compensation awarded under the head

Amount by the Tribunal (in Rs.)

Amount awarded by this Court (in Rs.)

1.

Future loss of earning capacity

Rs.18,14,400/-

Rs.43,69,680/-

2.

Medical expenses

Rs.7,90,000/-

Rs.7,90,000/-

3.

Pain and suffering

Rs.1,50,000/-

Rs.2,00,000/-

4.

Transportation expenses

Rs.15,000/-

Rs. 25,000/-

5.

Additional Nourishment

Rs.25,000/-

Rs.70,000/-

6

Damages to cloths

Rs.1,600/-

Rs.1,600/-

7

Attender charges

Rs.25,000/-

Rs.25,000/-

8

Loss of amenities

Rs.2,00,000/-

Rs.2,00,000/-

9.

Future medical expenses

Rs.7,00,000/-

Rs.1,00,000/-

Total

Rs.37,21,000/-

Rs.57,81,280/-

15. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced from Rs.37,21,000/- to Rs.57,81,280/-. The 2nd respondent Insurance company is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation amount, less the amount already deposited, together with interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of this judgment. On such deposit, the claimant is entitled to withdraw the compensation amount. Insofar as the enhanced compensation is concerned, the appellant/claimant will not be entitled for interest for the period of delay of 359 days as was ordered by this Court in C.M.P.No.4736 of 2023, dated 06.07.2026. Insofar as the enhanced compensation is concerned, the deficit court fee, if not paid, shall be paid by the appellant. The other directions issued by the Tribunal with regard to the mode of payment of compensation remains unaltered. The guidelines issued by the Division Bench of this Court in C.M.A.No.4736 of 2026, dated 06.07.2026 shall be strictly complied with respect to disbursement of the compensation amount to the claimant.

16. In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is Allowed in the above terms. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

 
  CDJLawJournal