logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide
24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 APHC 1082 My Notes print Preview print print
Court : High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Case No : Criminal Revision Case No. 3133 of 2016
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Parties : Ravi Sunil Versus The State of A P Another, By Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Amalapuram, Rep. Through Public Prosecutor, Andhra Pradesh & Another
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: S. Surendra Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor (AP).
Date of Judgment : 30-06-2026
Head Note :-
Civil Procedure Code - Section 151 -
Judgment :-

(Prayer: Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the orders dated 22-11-2016 in Crl.M.P.No.1045 in POCSO SC No. 16 /2016 on the file of the Court of the Ist Addl. District & Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Rajamahendravaram

IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 4903 OF 2016

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in POCSO SC No. 16 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the 1st Addl. District & Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Rajamahendravaram, and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 2690 OF 2017

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/defacto complainant to compromise her case in POCSO S.C.No. 16 of 2016 on the file of the First Addl. District Sessions Judge, Rajahmundry and acquit the accused and pass)

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant Criminal Revision case has become infructuous. The accused was acquitted by the learned Court below, so it is not necessary to proceed further in this Criminal Revision.

2. Heard learned counsel and perused the papers. It appears that the instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred against the order dated 22.11.2016 in Crl.M.P. No.1045 in POCSO Sessions Case No.16 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge, East Godavari, Rajamahendravaram. It appears that the learned Trial Court has dismissed discharge petition filed by the present petitioner/accused, against which instant Criminal Revision Petition has been filed. Perused the copy of the order placed across the Bench by learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears that the accused was acquitted from the case, having been found not guilty, by the learned Trial Court.

3. Considering the same, nothing remains to be decided by this Court in respect of the illegality and impropriety of the impugned order of discharge.

4. Accordingly, instance Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as infructuous.

Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
 
  CDJLawJournal