1. This is the first bail application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicants, namely, Rajdeep Yadav & Bablu Yadav, who apprehend their arrest in connection with Crime No.57/2026 registered at Police Station- Aron, District Guna (M.P.) for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1), 115(2), 351(3), 191(2), 191(3) & 190 of BNS and enhanced Section 118(2) of BNS.

2. The case of prosecution, in short, is that the applicants along with other co-accused persons abused and assaulted the complainant party with lathi and danda.

3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the applicants confined his prayer only to consideration of the application for grant of anticipatory bail only in respect of applicant No.2 Bablu Yadav and sought permission to withdraw the application qua applicant No.1 Rajdeep Yadav.

4. Prayer accepted.

5. The anticipatory bail application of applicant No.1- Rajdeep Yadav is dismissed as withdrawn.

6. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicant No.2 Bablu Yadav is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the matter. It is contended that the no specific overt act has been attributed to applicant No.2 in commission of the alleged offences. He further submits that applicant No.2 is a young boy of 26 years and jail incarceration would adversely affect his social reputation. Applicant No.2 is a permanent resident of District Guna (M.P.). He is ready and willing to co-operate in the investigation and abide by all the terms and conditions as may be imposed by the Court. On these grounds, learned counsel prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant No.2.

7. Per contra , learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the applicant and prayed for its rejection.

8. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 9 . Considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the fact that the applicant No.2 has not caused grievous hurt to complainant, but without commencing on the merits of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to applicant No.2. It is hereby directed that in the event of arrest, the applicant No.2 Bablu Yadav shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority/trial Court.

10. This order shall remain operative subject to compliance of following conditions by the applicant :-

          a. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him ;

          b. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/ trial, as the case may be;

          c. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be.

          d. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;

          e. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; f. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be;

          g. The applicant shall not involve himself in any criminal activity in future otherwise, benefit of bail shall immediately be withdrawn.

          h. In case of bail jump, this order will become ineffective.

11. Application stands allowed and disposed of accordingly.

12. A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance and information.

Certified copy as per rules.