logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 MHC 3638 print Preview print print
Court : Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
Case No : Tr.C.M.P (MD).No. 147 of 2026 & C.M.P(MD)No. 3134 of 2026
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. MURALI SHANKAR
Parties : Sumithra Versus Sivalingaraj
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: R. Ponkarthikeyan, Advocate. For the Respondent: No Appearance.
Date of Judgment : 27-04-2026
Head Note :-
Civil Procedure Code - Section 24 -
Judgment :-

(Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.34 of 2026 from the file of the Sub Court, Rasipuram, and transfer the same to the Sub Court, Vallioor.)

1. The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking orders to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.34 of 2026 from the file of the Sub Court, Rasipuram, and transfer the same to the Sub Court, Vallioor.

2. It is evident from the records that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 14.12.2023 as per Hindu rites and customs and that subsequently, there arose some misunderstanding between them and they are living separately.

3. It is not in dispute that the respondent has filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.34 of 2026, seeking divorce and the same is pending on the file of the Sub Court, Rasipuram.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner underwent renal transplant and hence, she finds it very difficult to travel to Rasipuram to attend the hearings.

5. Despite receipt of Court notice as well as private notice, the respondent has not turned up. Even today, there is no representation for the respondent.

6. In the case of N.C.V.Aishwarya Vs. A.S.Saravana Karthik Sha reported in 2022 Live Law (SC) 627, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has reiterated the position with generally, it is the wife's convenience, which must be looked at while considering the transfer petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the relevant passage is extracted hereunder :

                  “The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.", the bench observed.”

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that the petitioner is residing at Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District, this Court is inclined to allow this petition. Accordingly, the case in H.M.O.P.No.34 of 2026, is ordered to be withdrawn from the file of the Sub Court, Rasipuram, and transfer the same to the Sub Court, Vallioor. The learned Sub Judge, Rasipuram, is hereby directed to transmit the entire records in H.M.O.P.No.34 of 2026 to the file of the Sub Court, Vallioor, within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receiving the case bundle, the learned Sub Judge, Vallioor, is directed to take up the petition on file and proceed in accordance with law.

8. With the above direction, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

 
  CDJLawJournal