1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 230/2025 for the offence registered under Sections 317, 319, 318, 338, 340, 61(2) of BNS and Section 66(C), 66(D) of IT Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M., Hazaribagh.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there are two petitioners in this case. So far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, two mobile phones are alleged to have been recovered from him, which are standing in his name. He submits that neither any victim has been identified nor the petitioner no. 1 has any criminal antecedent. He submits that the petitioner no. 1 is in custody since 24.12.2025 having no criminal antecedent and the charge has already been framed.

3. So far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, from his flat, numerous SIM cards, mobile phones and ATM cards were recovered, which were not standing in his name. He submits that the petitioner no. 2 is in custody since 24.12.2025 having no criminal antecedent and the charge has already been framed.

4. The learned counsel submits that the two co-accused have been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No. 2200/2026 and B.A. No. 2902/2026, both dated 21.04.2026 and considering the recovery from the possession of petitioner no. 1, the case of petitioner no. 1 stands on same footing.

5. Learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, no victim has been identified and there is no complaint in the portal, but so far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, there are numerous complaints recorded in the Pratibimb App linking the petitioner no. 2 with the commission of cyber offence.

6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, who is having no criminal antecedent and no material could be shown by the learned counsel for the opposite party linking the petitioner no. 1 with the alleged offence, the petitioner no. 1 is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Hazaribagh in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 230/2025, subject to the following conditions: -

                  (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

                  (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

                  (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

                  (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.

                  (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.

7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions, so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned.

8. So far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, it appears from the records that there are sufficient materials collected against petitioner no. 2 and there are numerous complaints recorded in the Pratibimb App linking the petitioner no. 2 with the commission of cyber offence, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner no. 2 on bail. Accordingly, the bail application of petitioner no. 2 is rejected.

9. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e-mail/FAX’.