1. Heard Mr. Kuturu Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondents No.1 to 3; learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for respondents No.4 to 9; and perused the material on record.

2. Suit in O.S. No.101 of 2019 was filed for perpetual injunction by the petitioners against respondent No.10 on the file of the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Vikarabad wherein temporary injunction order dated 30.10.2023 was passed in I.A. No.258 of 2019 in O.S. No.101 of 2019 restraining respondent No.10 from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in respect of the property bearing Acs.5-37 guntas in Survey No.41, situated at Poolapally Village, Nawabpet Mandal, Vikarabad District.

3. The petitioners claim title and possession over the subject property on the strength of e-pattadar pass books bearing Nos.T07120220794 with Khata No.60033; T07120220561 with Khata No.882 and T07120221199 with Khata No.60531. The grievance of the petitioners is that at the instance of respondent No.6, respondents No.3, 7 and 8 are interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners without following due process of law, as such, the petitioners are constrained to approach this Court.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that the dispute pending between the petitioners and respondent No.10 is a civil dispute and there is no interference by the Police authorities with the possession of the petitioners in respect of the subject property.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submitted that the question of interference by the revenue authorities in civil disputes does not arise.

6. However as it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there is interference by the respondent authorities with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the subject property, without entering into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in respect of the property admeasuring Acs.5-37 guntas in Survey No.41, situated at Poolapally Village, Nawabpet Mandal, Vikarabad District, without following due process of law.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioners sought for direction to respondent No.7 to extend Police aid for implementation of the injunction order dated 30.10.2023. It is made clear as and when application is submitted by the petitioners for extending Police aid, respondent No.7 shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

8. As the order is passed without entering into the merits of the case, notice to respondent No.10 is dispensed with. However, if respondent No.10 is, in any way aggrieved by this order, he is at liberty to approach this Court, seeking for modification of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition, stand closed.