1. This second appeal has been filed against the judgement and decree dated 27.03.2018 and 03.04.2018 respectively passed by learned Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, in Title Appeal No.34 of 2015 and the judgement and decree dated 30.08.2008 and 09.09.2008 passed by learned Munsif, Ranchi, in Partition Suit No.149 of 2006.

2. Nobody appears on behalf of the appellant. No adjournment notice has been circulated.

3. On 15.01.2026, following order was passed:

                  “Nobody appears on behalf of the appellants.

                  2. As per office note, certified copy of decree passed in Partition Suit No. 149 of 2006 and Title Appeal No. 34 of 2015 were sent to the Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi for correction and in response, a letter no. 93 dated 08.01.2026 has been received stating that name of Ajay Oraon respondent no. 2 has not been mentioned as party either in the cause title of the memo of appeal in Title Appeal No. 34 of 2015 or in the cause title of the plaint of Partition Suit No. 149 of 2006. Accordingly, there is a defect in connection with party position while including Ajay Oraon as respondent.

                  3. The learned counsel for the appellants is directed to take steps either to delete the name of Ajay Oraon from the cause title or to file appropriate petition in connection with Ajay Oraon explaining the circumstances under which he has been made party in this proceeding by 11.02.2026.

                  4. Since, the learned counsel for the appellant is absent, let a soft copy of this order be communicated to the learned counsel for the appellants for compliance.

                  5. Post this case on 13.02.2026.”

4. Thereafter, the case was taken up on 13.02.2026, when the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he had no instructions in the matter, and therefore, the appropriate petition in terms of order dated 15.01.2026, had not been filed.

5. The matter was adjourned by way of last indulgence and was directed to be posted on 25.02.2026 and it was fixed for hearing on the point of framing substantial question of law.

6. Today, the learned counsel for the appellant is absent and no adjournment notice has been circulated.

7. Accordingly, this second appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.

8. Let a soft copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/email.