logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 MHC 2619 print Preview print print
Court : High Court of Judicature at Madras
Case No : WP. No. 12585 of 2026 & WMP. Nos. 13735 & 13736 of 2026
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
Parties : Tvl.TNT Regular Service, (Represented by its Proprietrix M. Renuka Devi) Salem Versus The Deputy State Tax Officer-2 Suramangalam Circle,Salem
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: M/s. S. Vishnupriya, Advocate. For the Respondent: C. Harsharaj, Special Government Pleader.
Date of Judgment : 01-04-2026
Head Note :-
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Judgment :-

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the files of the Respondent herein vide order Ref.No. GSTIN 33AHKPR2442L2Z3/2021-22 along with the summary of the order in GST DRC-07 reference no. ZD331125246404R dated 26th December 2025 for the period between April 2021 to March 2022 and quash the same.)

1. Mr.C.Harsharaj, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the Respondent.

2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondent.

3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order along with the summary of the order in GST DRC-07 reference no. ZD331125246404R dated 26.12.2025 of the Respondent, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 24.09.2025.

4. The Petitioner was also issued with Reminders on 01.11.2025, 11.11.2025 and 06.12.2025 which called upon the Petitioner to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. The Petitioner has filed a reply dated 18.12.2025 requesting to grant time and did not appear for the personal hearings. Thus, the impugned Order has been passed.

5. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal is prescribed under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order is within the limitation. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 17.03.2026.

6. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 10% of the disputed tax as a condition for de novo adjudication.

7. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court Bundle, which is extracted hereunder:-

               “ We oblige to deposit 10 % of tax”

8. Recording the above consent, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

9. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 24.09.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 26.12.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 24.09.2025.

10. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply / pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.

11. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the deposit of 10% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

12. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

13. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

14. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

 
  CDJLawJournal