1. This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:

               “… to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the respondents herein in rejecting the petitioner’s application No.NR905254545351, dated 17.11.2025, for power supply service connection to the petitioner’s property i.e., all that the house property bearing Municipal No.13-6-418/A/5, admeasuring 318.44 sq.yards situated at Moghal Nagar, Ring Road, Gudimalkapur, Hyderabad, on the ground of ‘Rejected as Court Case pending’ without following due procedure of law as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Articles 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India besides being in violation of the Electricity Act, 2003 and principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the online rejection order and thereby direct the respondents herein to provide power supply service connection to the petitioner’s property i.e., all that the house property bearing Municipal No.13-6-418/A/5, admeasuring 318.44 sq. yards, situated at Moghal Nagar, Ring Road, Gudimalkapur, Hyderabad, based on its application No.NR905254545351, dated 17.11.2025, forthwith and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

2. Heard Sri Katika Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Energy appearing for respondent No.1 and Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the house property bearing Municipal No.13-6-418/A/5, admeasuring 318.44 square yards, situated at Moghal Nagar, Ring Road, Gudimalkapur, Hyderabad. He submitted online application dated 17.11.2025 to the respondents for power supply to the said house property, but the respondents have rejected the said application on the premise of not producing occupancy certificate.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner produced photos to show that the said house property is at the stage of construction of pillars only and therefore, the question of producing occupancy certificate does not arise. The petitioner is seeking temporary connection provided to the buildings which are under construction.

5. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-TGSPDCL submits that the petitioner had submitted the application under domestic category, which is meant for the buildings, which are already constructed and there is a different category for providing power supply to the under construction buildings.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner has submitted the application under domestic category which is meant for the buildings already constructed. The petitioner may seek power supply by submitting a fresh application to the respondents under relevant category.

7. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this petition, shall stand closed.